Re: [PATCH] Add help details to git help command. (This time with Perl)

We've decided to go for the individual scripts directly. :-) Just to clarify - individual scripts or $0 name handling? I kinda like one big script - also means we don't need to 'install' it to get access to Cogito.pm... Unfortunately, you didn't send the attachments inline, so I can't comment on

Re: [PATCH] Add help details to git help command. (This time with Perl)

Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 09:04:16PM CEST, I got a letter where David Greaves [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... I don't love the 'require gitadd.pl' but it's a gradual start... I hate it, for one. ;-) Cogito.pm seems to be a good place for the library stuff. Sounds sensible.

Re: [PATCH] Add help details to git help command. (This time with Perl)

Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 07:35:15PM CEST, I got a letter where Steven Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... Example: ..snip a perfect-looking example.. - Speaking of 'git diff', I ran that before applying the following patch, and got a diff starting thusly: ---

Re: [PATCH] Add help details to git help command. (This time with Perl)

Steven Cole wrote: Speaking of I think, the name cogito was suggested for the SCM layer, but IIRC Linus suggested staying with just plain git. Petr suggested tig, perhaps because it looks at git from another point of view. I haven't read _all_ the mails - I thought cogito was kinda selected and