On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 11:40:23AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Sebastian Schuberth sschube...@gmail.com writes:
Perhaps something like this, so that existing users can still use
bc3 and other people can use bc if it bothers them that they
have to say 3 when the backend driver works with
David Aguilar dav...@gmail.com writes:
Otherwise, this patch looks like the right way to go ~ it makes
bc available and keeps compatibility for bc3.
OK, thanks. Here is what I'll queue.
-- 8 --
From: Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 15:49:36 -0700
Subject: [PATCH]
Beyond compare 4 is out since september 2014. The CLI interface doesn't seem to
have changed compared to the version 3.
Signed-off-by: Olivier Croquette ocroque...@free.fr
---
mergetools/bc4 | 25 +
1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644
Olivier Croquette ocroque...@free.fr writes:
Beyond compare 4 is out since september 2014. The CLI interface
doesn't seem to have changed compared to the version 3.
Hmph, if this is identical to mergetools/bc3, why is the patch even
needed? Do we auto-detect something and try to use bc4 which
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
Olivier Croquette ocroque...@free.fr writes:
Beyond compare 4 is out since september 2014. The CLI interface
doesn't seem to have changed compared to the version 3.
Hmph, if this is identical to mergetools/bc3, why is the patch even
needed? Do we
On 20.10.2014 19:32, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Beyond compare 4 is out since september 2014. The CLI interface
doesn't seem to have changed compared to the version 3.
Hmph, if this is identical to mergetools/bc3, why is the patch even
needed? Do we auto-detect something and try to use bc4 which
Sebastian Schuberth sschube...@gmail.com writes:
Perhaps something like this, so that existing users can still use
bc3 and other people can use bc if it bothers them that they
have to say 3 when the backend driver works with both 3 and 4?
That indeed sounds like the best approach.
---
On 20 Oct 2014, at 19:32, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Perhaps something like this, so that existing users can still use
bc3 and other people can use bc if it bothers them that they
have to say 3 when the backend driver works with both 3 and 4?
Thanks for the quick and great
8 matches
Mail list logo