Re: [PATCH] Documentation/log: fix description of format.pretty

2012-11-12 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi Ram, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote: 59893a88 (Documentation/log: add a CONFIGURATION section, 2010-05-08) mentioned that `format.pretty` is the default for the `--format` option. Such an option never existed, False. Have you tried it? Thanks, Jonathan -- To unsubscribe from this list:

Re: [PATCH] Documentation/log: fix description of format.pretty

2012-11-12 Thread Ramkumar Ramachandra
Hi Jonathan, Jonathan Nieder wrote: Hi Ram, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote: 59893a88 (Documentation/log: add a CONFIGURATION section, 2010-05-08) mentioned that `format.pretty` is the default for the `--format` option. Such an option never existed, False. Have you tried it? Oops, I read

Re: [PATCH] Documentation/log: fix description of format.pretty

2012-11-12 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote: Oops, I read about `--pretty` in pretty-formats.txt and didn't realize that `--format` existed. However, your patch is still wrong because there seems to be a subtle (and confusing) difference between `--pretty` and `--format`. In the latter, you can't omit the

Re: [PATCH] Documentation/log: fix description of format.pretty

2012-11-12 Thread Junio C Hamano
Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com writes: Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote: Oops, I read about `--pretty` in pretty-formats.txt and didn't realize that `--format` existed. However, your patch is still wrong because there seems to be a subtle (and confusing) difference between `--pretty` and