On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 07:55:17AM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 01:35:38PM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 06:36:41PM +0100, Matthieu Moy wrote:
Yes, main point is size of executable.
The Git executable is a few megabytes, i.e. 0.001% the size
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 06:50:37PM +0600, Alexander Kuleshov wrote:
Standard user has no need in debugging information. This patch adds
DEBUG=1 option to compile git with debugging symbols and compile without
it by default.
This explanation is missing why it is beneficial _not_ to have the
Standard user has no need in debugging information. This patch adds
DEBUG=1 option to compile git with debugging symbols and compile without
it by default.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kuleshov kuleshovm...@gmail.com
---
Makefile | 9 -
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 06:36:41PM +0100, Matthieu Moy wrote:
Yes, main point is size of executable.
The Git executable is a few megabytes, i.e. 0.001% the size of a really
small hard disk. The benefit seems really negligible to me.
I don't know the layout of the symbols with respect to
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 08:00:36AM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 06:50:37PM +0600, Alexander Kuleshov wrote:
Standard user has no need in debugging information. This patch adds
DEBUG=1 option to compile git with debugging symbols and compile without
it by default.
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 01:35:38PM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 06:36:41PM +0100, Matthieu Moy wrote:
Yes, main point is size of executable.
The Git executable is a few megabytes, i.e. 0.001% the size of a really
small hard disk. The benefit seems really negligible
Hello Jeff,
Yes, main point is size of executable. I'm sorry, didn't see 'strip' target.
What if we will strip git and other executable files by default and
add -g option and don't strip it if DEBUG=1 passed to make. Something
like this:
git$X: git.o GIT-LDFLAGS $(BUILTIN_OBJS) $(GITLIBS)
Or even still -g as it now, because anyway debugging info will be
removed with stripping
2015-01-22 22:51 GMT+06:00 Alexander Kuleshov kuleshovm...@gmail.com:
Hello Jeff,
Yes, main point is size of executable. I'm sorry, didn't see 'strip' target.
What if we will strip git and other
Alexander Kuleshov kuleshovm...@gmail.com writes:
Hello Jeff,
Yes, main point is size of executable.
The Git executable is a few megabytes, i.e. 0.001% the size of a really
small hard disk. The benefit seems really negligible to me.
OTOH, debug information allow users to do better bug
9 matches
Mail list logo
