Josh Steadmon writes:
> OSS-Fuzz only provides one set of CXXFLAGS for use on both compiling
> project C++ project files as well linking the fuzzers themselves. So in
> the event that Git ever added any C++ sources, they would need to use
> the same set of CXXFLAGS.
OK.
> Given that, do you
On 2018.11.13 12:12, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> stead...@google.com writes:
>
> > OSS-Fuzz requires C++-specific flags to link fuzzers. Passing these in
> > CFLAGS causes lots of build warnings. Using separate CXXFLAGS avoids
> > this.
>
> We are not a C++ shop, so allow me to show ignorance about
stead...@google.com writes:
> OSS-Fuzz requires C++-specific flags to link fuzzers. Passing these in
> CFLAGS causes lots of build warnings. Using separate CXXFLAGS avoids
> this.
We are not a C++ shop, so allow me to show ignorance about how
projects that are OSS-Fuzz-enabled work. Do they use
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 2:03 PM wrote:
>
> OSS-Fuzz requires C++-specific flags to link fuzzers. Passing these in
> CFLAGS causes lots of build warnings. Using separate CXXFLAGS avoids
> this.
>
That makes sense in this context,
> CFLAGS = -g -O2 -Wall
> +CXXFLAGS ?= $(CFLAGS)
... but
OSS-Fuzz requires C++-specific flags to link fuzzers. Passing these in
CFLAGS causes lots of build warnings. Using separate CXXFLAGS avoids
this.
Signed-off-by: Josh Steadmon
---
Makefile | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index
5 matches
Mail list logo