On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 9:03 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 09:12:55PM -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
>
>> I encountered this issue in git 2.4.3 on Fedora 22.
>
> Ah, sorry, you're right. I must have fed the wrong sha1 to "git tag
> --contains" earlier.
>
> I agree it can probably g
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 09:12:55PM -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
> I encountered this issue in git 2.4.3 on Fedora 22.
Ah, sorry, you're right. I must have fed the wrong sha1 to "git tag
--contains" earlier.
I agree it can probably go onto the v2.4.x maintenance track. It is
already in v2.5.0-rc
Um.
I encountered this issue in git 2.4.3 on Fedora 22.
These lines appear in /usr/libexec/git-core/git-stash on my Fedora 22
system:
git diff-index --cached --quiet --ignore-submodules HEAD -- ||
die "$(gettext "Cannot apply stash: Your index contains
uncommitted cha
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 05:49:11PM -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
> Is this revert going to be applied and released?
It is on "master", and part of v2.5.0-rc0 (it is not part of v2.4.x, because
the original problem was not there, either).
-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "uns
Is this revert going to be applied and released?
Sent from my Android device
-Original Message-
From: Junio C Hamano
To: Jeff King
Cc: "bär" , Jonathan Kamens ,
Git List
Sent: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 4:11 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "stash: require a clean index to ap
Jeff King writes:
> Subject: Revert "stash: require a clean index to apply"
>
> This reverts commit ed178ef13a26136d86ff4e33bb7b1afb5033f908.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at ht
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 10:42:18AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > I dunno. With respect to the original patch, I am OK if we just want to
> > revert it. This area of stash seems a bit under-designed IMHO, but if
> > people were happy enough with it before, I do not think the safety
> > benefit f
7 matches
Mail list logo