4:11 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert stash: require a clean index to apply
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
Subject: Revert stash: require a clean index to apply
This reverts commit ed178ef13a26136d86ff4e33bb7b1afb5033f908.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 09:12:55PM -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
I encountered this issue in git 2.4.3 on Fedora 22.
Ah, sorry, you're right. I must have fed the wrong sha1 to git tag
--contains earlier.
I agree it can probably go onto the v2.4.x maintenance track. It is
already in v2.5.0-rc0.
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 9:03 PM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 09:12:55PM -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
I encountered this issue in git 2.4.3 on Fedora 22.
Ah, sorry, you're right. I must have fed the wrong sha1 to git tag
--contains earlier.
I agree it can
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 05:49:11PM -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
Is this revert going to be applied and released?
It is on master, and part of v2.5.0-rc0 (it is not part of v2.4.x, because
the original problem was not there, either).
-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Um.
I encountered this issue in git 2.4.3 on Fedora 22.
These lines appear in /usr/libexec/git-core/git-stash on my Fedora 22
system:
git diff-index --cached --quiet --ignore-submodules HEAD -- ||
die $(gettext Cannot apply stash: Your index contains
uncommitted
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 10:42:18AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
I dunno. With respect to the original patch, I am OK if we just want to
revert it. This area of stash seems a bit under-designed IMHO, but if
people were happy enough with it before, I do not think the safety
benefit from
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
Subject: Revert stash: require a clean index to apply
This reverts commit ed178ef13a26136d86ff4e33bb7b1afb5033f908.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info
7 matches
Mail list logo