On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> On 05/06/2014 12:57 AM, Ronnie Sahlberg wrote:
>> This is a single patch that adds two new functions to try to hide the reflog
>> implementation details from the callers in checkout.c and reflog.c.
>> It adds new functions to test if a refl
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Ronnie Sahlberg writes:
>
>> It currently has a hard assumption that the loose ref file must exist at this
>> stage or else it would end up deleting the reflog which is true today, as far
>> as I can tell, but would break if git would chang
Ronnie Sahlberg writes:
> It currently has a hard assumption that the loose ref file must exist at this
> stage or else it would end up deleting the reflog which is true today, as far
> as I can tell, but would break if git would change such that we could have
> a branch checked out without havin
On 05/06/2014 12:57 AM, Ronnie Sahlberg wrote:
> This is a single patch that adds two new functions to try to hide the reflog
> implementation details from the callers in checkout.c and reflog.c.
> It adds new functions to test if a reflog exists and to delete it, thus
> allowing checkout.c to perf
This is a single patch that adds two new functions to try to hide the reflog
implementation details from the callers in checkout.c and reflog.c.
It adds new functions to test if a reflog exists and to delete it, thus
allowing checkout.c to perform this if-test-then-delete operation without
having t
5 matches
Mail list logo