[PATCH] build: add default configuration

2013-09-17 Thread Felipe Contreras
For now simply add a few common aliases. co = checkout ci = commit rb = rebase st = status Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras --- Makefile | 5 - gitconfig | 5 + 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 gitconfig diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index

Re: [PATCH] build: add default configuration

2013-09-18 Thread David Aguilar
users from overriding these? -Original Message- From: Felipe Contreras To: git@vger.kernel.org Cc: git-us...@googlegroups.com, "Bráulio Bhavamitra" , Felipe Contreras Sent: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 8:23 AM Subject: [PATCH] build: add default configuration For now simply add a few

Re: [PATCH] build: add default configuration

2013-09-18 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:13 PM, David Aguilar wrote: > Apologies for top post -- anybody have a recommendation for a better app then > maildroid? > > Will this not conflict with folks that supply their own gitconfig? You mean people that provide their own ETC_GITCONFIG? If you mean distribution

Re: [PATCH] build: add default configuration

2013-09-18 Thread David Aguilar
>On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:13 PM, David Aguilar wrote: >> >> Will this not conflict with folks that supply their own gitconfig? > You mean people that provide their own ETC_GITCONFIG? If you mean distributions, their packaging would override /etc/gitconfig, if you mean people that have already a

Re: [PATCH] build: add default configuration

2013-09-18 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 9:30 PM, David Aguilar wrote: >>On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:13 PM, David Aguilar wrote: >>> >>> Will this not conflict with folks that supply their own gitconfig? > >> You mean people that provide their own ETC_GITCONFIG? If you mean > distributions, their packaging would ov

Re: [PATCH] build: add default configuration

2013-09-20 Thread David Aguilar
Felipe Contreras wrote: >On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 9:30 PM, David Aguilar >wrote: >>>On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:13 PM, David Aguilar >wrote: Will this not conflict with folks that supply their own gitconfig? >> >>> You mean people that provide their own ETC_GITCONFIG? If you mean >> distr

Re: [PATCH] build: add default configuration

2013-09-20 Thread Felipe Contreras
David Aguilar wrote: > Felipe Contreras wrote: > >On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 9:30 PM, David Aguilar > >wrote: > >>>On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:13 PM, David Aguilar > >wrote: > > Will this not conflict with folks that supply their own gitconfig? > >> > >>> You mean people that provide their

Re: [PATCH] build: add default configuration

2013-09-20 Thread David Aguilar
Felipe Contreras wrote: >David Aguilar wrote: >> Felipe Contreras wrote: >> >On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 9:30 PM, David Aguilar >> >wrote: >> >>>On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:13 PM, David Aguilar >> >wrote: >> >> Will this not conflict with folks that supply their own >gitconfig? >> >> >> >>>

Re: [PATCH] build: add default configuration

2013-09-20 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 7:44 PM, David Aguilar wrote: > Felipe Contreras wrote: >>David Aguilar wrote: >>> Felipe Contreras wrote: >>> >On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 9:30 PM, David Aguilar >>> >wrote: >>> >>>On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:13 PM, David Aguilar >>> >wrote: >>> >>> Will this not c

Re: [PATCH] build: add default configuration

2013-09-20 Thread David Aguilar
Felipe Contreras wrote: >I know 'git ci' is perfectly fine shortcut to 'git commit'. > >Either way, it doesn't matter. Even if we agree that /etc/gitconfig.d >is what we want, or we add an /usr/share/git/config, Junio is not >going to apply any patch, even if it's what most users want. Please sto

Re: [PATCH] build: add default configuration

2013-09-21 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 1:33 AM, David Aguilar wrote: > Felipe Contreras wrote: >>I know 'git ci' is perfectly fine shortcut to 'git commit'. >> >>Either way, it doesn't matter. Even if we agree that /etc/gitconfig.d >>is what we want, or we add an /usr/share/git/config, Junio is not >>going to a