Hi Rupert,
On 2015-04-23 21:25, rupert thurner wrote:
On Thursday, April 16, 2015 at 2:45:11 PM UTC+2, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
However, using this code for `getppid()` would be serious overkill (not to
mention an unbearable performance hit because you have to enumerate *all*
processes to
Hi Junio,
On 2015-04-15 20:48, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Johannes Sixt j...@kdbg.org writes:
Windows does not have process groups. It is, therefore, the simplest
to pretend that each process is in its own process group.
While here, move the getppid() stub from its old location (between
two
Hi kusma,
On 2015-04-15 21:43, Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 8:29 PM, Johannes Sixt j...@kdbg.org wrote:
Windows does not have process groups. It is, therefore, the simplest
to pretend that each process is in its own process group.
Windows does have some concept of process
Johannes Schindelin johannes.schinde...@gmx.de writes:
On 2015-04-15 20:48, Junio C Hamano wrote:
The patch should do for now, but I suspect that it may give us a
better abstraction to make the is_foreground_fd(int fd) or even
is_foreground(void) the public API that would be implemented as
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 08:29:30PM +0200, Johannes Sixt wrote:
| Windows does not have process groups. It is, therefore, the simplest
| to pretend that each process is in its own process group.
|
| [...]
|
| diff --git a/compat/mingw.h b/compat/mingw.h
| index 7b523cf..a552026
Windows does not have process groups. It is, therefore, the simplest
to pretend that each process is in its own process group.
While here, move the getppid() stub from its old location (between
two sync related functions) next to the two new functions.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt j...@kdbg.org
Johannes Sixt j...@kdbg.org writes:
Windows does not have process groups. It is, therefore, the simplest
to pretend that each process is in its own process group.
While here, move the getppid() stub from its old location (between
two sync related functions) next to the two new functions.
Am 15.04.2015 um 20:48 schrieb Junio C Hamano:
The patch should do for now, but I suspect that it may give us a
better abstraction to make the is_foreground_fd(int fd) or even
is_foreground(void) the public API that would be implemented as
int we_are_in_the_foreground(void)
{
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 8:29 PM, Johannes Sixt j...@kdbg.org wrote:
Windows does not have process groups. It is, therefore, the simplest
to pretend that each process is in its own process group.
Windows does have some concept of process groups, but probably not
quite what you want:
9 matches
Mail list logo
