On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 11:37:28AM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jeff King writes:
>
> > So there are two separate questions/tasks:
> >
> > 1. Should we remove the special handling of "-q" leftover from this
> > deprecation? I think the answer is yes.
> >
> > 2. Should
Jeff King writes:
> So there are two separate questions/tasks:
>
> 1. Should we remove the special handling of "-q" leftover from this
> deprecation? I think the answer is yes.
>
> 2. Should we teach the diff machinery as a whole to treat "-q" as a
> synonym for
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 09:44:15AM -0700, Anthony Sottile wrote:
> Previously, `-q` was silently ignored:
I'm not sure if is totally ignored. Normally if we have an unknown
options we'd complain:
$ git diff -x
error: invalid option: -x
but we don't with "-q". Why?
In builtin/diff.c:471,
Previously, `-q` was silently ignored:
Before:
$ git diff -q -- Documentation/; echo $?
diff --git a/Documentation/diff-options.txt b/Documentation/diff-options.txt
index a88c767..aa6e724 100644
--- a/Documentation/diff-options.txt
+++ b/Documentation/diff-options.txt
@@ -587,6 +587,7 @@
4 matches
Mail list logo