Re: [PATCH] doc: move git-rev-parse from porcelain to plumbing

Daniels Umanovskis writes: > On 10/11/18 12:26 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Among the remaining ones in the list, cherry and get-tar-commit-id >> are probably better classified as plumbing. I do not know why >> cherry is marked for completion; perhaps some crazy people use that >> on the

Re: [PATCH] doc: move git-rev-parse from porcelain to plumbing

On 10/11/18 12:26 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Among the remaining ones in the list, cherry and get-tar-commit-id > are probably better classified as plumbing. I do not know why > cherry is marked for completion; perhaps some crazy people use that > on the command line? I think cherry could go

Re: [PATCH] doc: move git-rev-parse from porcelain to plumbing

Daniels Umanovskis writes: > git-rev-parse mostly seems like plumbing, and is more usd in > scripts than in regular use. Online it's often mentioned as > a plumbing command. Nonetheless it's listed under porcelain > interrogators in `man git`. It seems appropriate to formally > move

[PATCH] doc: move git-rev-parse from porcelain to plumbing

git-rev-parse mostly seems like plumbing, and is more usd in scripts than in regular use. Online it's often mentioned as a plumbing command. Nonetheless it's listed under porcelain interrogators in `man git`. It seems appropriate to formally move git-rev-parse to plumbing interrogators.