On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 6:08 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Gabor Bernat writes:
>
>> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:24 PM, Gábor Bernát
>> ...
>>> Agreed, :) did not abandoned this, just got caught up with many stuff.
>>> Thanks for the help,
>>
>> So do I need to do anything else with this? :)
>
> If
Gabor Bernat writes:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:24 PM, Gábor Bernát
> ...
>> Agreed, :) did not abandoned this, just got caught up with many stuff.
>> Thanks for the help,
>
> So do I need to do anything else with this? :)
If you can fetch from me to see if the output from
git log -p orig
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:24 PM, Gábor Bernát
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:22 PM, Eric Sunshine
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> > Eric Sunshine writes:
>> >> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Junio C Hamano
>> >> wrote:
>> >>> Eric Sunshine write
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Eric Sunshine writes:
>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>> Eric Sunshine writes:
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Gábor Bernát wrote:
...
> # Rewrite the commits
> +report_progress ()
> +{
>>>
Eric Sunshine writes:
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Eric Sunshine writes:
>>> On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Gábor Bernát wrote:
>>>...
# Rewrite the commits
+report_progress ()
+{
+if test -n "$progress"
+then
>>>
>>> Indent code within
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 10:32:12AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Also git_filter_branch__commit_count is now used only inside this
> function, so it is easier to follow to increment it here.
>
> I suspect that the variable has this unwieldy name for historic
> reasons, perhaps an attempt to avoi
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Eric Sunshine writes:
>> On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Gábor Bernát wrote:
>>...
>>> # Rewrite the commits
>>> +report_progress ()
>>> +{
>>> +if test -n "$progress"
>>> +then
>>
>> Indent code within the function...
>
> Also git_filter_
Eric Sunshine writes:
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Gábor Bernát wrote:
>...
>> # Rewrite the commits
>> +report_progress ()
>> +{
>> +if test -n "$progress"
>> +then
>
> Indent code within the function...
Also git_filter_branch__commit_count is now used only inside this
function, so it is
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Gábor Bernát wrote:
> From: Gabor Bernat
>
> adds seconds progress and estimated seconds time if getting the current
> timestamp is supported by the date +%s command
>
> Signed-off-by: Gabor Bernat
> ---
> diff --git a/git-filter-branch.sh b/git-filter-branch.sh
>
From: Gabor Bernat
adds seconds progress and estimated seconds time if getting the current
timestamp is supported by the date +%s command
Signed-off-by: Gabor Bernat
---
I've submitted this first to this list as a feature request, however
in the meantime with the help of Jeff King , Junio C
Ha
On 07/09/15 13:31, Gábor Bernát wrote:
> From: Gabor Bernat
>
> adds seconds progress and estimated seconds time if getting the current
> timestamp is supported by the date %+s command
s/%+s/+%s/
ATB,
Ramsay Jones
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body
From: Gabor Bernat
adds seconds progress and estimated seconds time if getting the current
timestamp is supported by the date %+s command
Signed-off-by: Gabor Bernat
---
I've submitted this first to this list as a feature request, however
in the meantime with the help of Jeff King , Junio C
Ha
Gábor Bernát writes:
> +if date '+%s' 2>/dev/null | grep -q '^[0-9][0-9]*$'
> +then
> + show_seconds=t
> +else
> + show_seconds=
> +fi
> +
> +case "$show_seconds" in
> +t)
> + start_timestamp=$(date +%s)
> + next_sample_at=0
> + ;;
> +'')
> + progress=""
> + ;;
> +esac
From: Gabor Bernat
adds seconds progress and estimated seconds time if getting the current
timestamp is supported by the date %+s command
Signed-off-by: Gabor Bernat
---
I've submitted this first to this list as a feature request, however
in the meantime with the help of Jeff King , Junio C
Ha
On Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at 5:49 AM, Gabor Bernat wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 10:15 PM, Eric Sunshine
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>> Gábor Bernát writes:
+echo $(date +%s) | grep -q '^[0-9]+$'; 2>/dev/null && show_seconds=t
>>>
>>> That is very stran
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 10:15 PM, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Gábor Bernát writes:
>>> +echo $(date +%s) | grep -q '^[0-9]+$'; 2>/dev/null && show_seconds=t
>>
>> That is very strange construct. I think you meant to say something
>> like
>>
>>
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Gábor Bernát writes:
>> +echo $(date +%s) | grep -q '^[0-9]+$'; 2>/dev/null && show_seconds=t
>
> That is very strange construct. I think you meant to say something
> like
>
> if date '+%s' 2>/dev/null | grep -q '^[0-9][0-9]*$'
>
Gábor Bernát writes:
> @@ -277,9 +277,43 @@ test $commits -eq 0 && die "Found nothing to rewrite"
> # Rewrite the commits
>
> git_filter_branch__commit_count=0
This is not a new problem, but I wonder why we need such a
cumbersomely long variable name. It is not like this is a part of
some s
From: Gabor Bernat
adds seconds progress and estimated seconds time if getting the current
timestamp is supported by the date %+s command
Signed-off-by: Gabor Bernat
---
I've submitted this first to this list as a feature request, however
in the meantime with the help of Jeff King , Junio C
Ha
19 matches
Mail list logo
