>> "git filter-branch -- --all" print unwanted error messages when refs that
>> cannot be used with ^0 exist.
>
> It is not incorrect per-se, but if I were writing this, I'd say
> "... when refs that point at objects that are not committish" or
> something like that, as that is much closer to
> However, if we pre-filter to limit the refs in "$tempdir/heads" to
> those that are committish (i.e. those that pass "$ref^0") like the
> patch and subsequent discussion suggests, wouldn't we lose the
> warning for these replace refs and non-committish tags. We perhaps
> could do something
Yuki Kokubun writes:
>> Yuki Kokubun writes:
>>
>> >> Yuki Kokubun writes:
>> >>
>> >> > "git filter-branch -- --all" can be confused when refs that refer to
>> >> > objects
>> >> > other than commits or tags exists.
> Yuki Kokubun writes:
>
> >> Yuki Kokubun writes:
> >>
> >> > "git filter-branch -- --all" can be confused when refs that refer to
> >> > objects
> >> > other than commits or tags exists.
> >> > Because "git rev-parse --all" that is
Yuki Kokubun writes:
>> Yuki Kokubun writes:
>>
>> > "git filter-branch -- --all" can be confused when refs that refer to
>> > objects
>> > other than commits or tags exists.
>> > Because "git rev-parse --all" that is internally used can
> Yuki Kokubun writes:
>
> > "git filter-branch -- --all" can be confused when refs that refer to objects
> > other than commits or tags exists.
> > Because "git rev-parse --all" that is internally used can return refs that
> > refer to an object other than commit or
Yuki Kokubun writes:
> "git filter-branch -- --all" can be confused when refs that refer to objects
> other than commits or tags exists.
> Because "git rev-parse --all" that is internally used can return refs that
> refer to an object other than commit or tag. But it is
"git filter-branch -- --all" can be confused when refs that refer to objects
other than commits or tags exists.
Because "git rev-parse --all" that is internally used can return refs that
refer to an object other than commit or tag. But it is not considered in the
phase of updating refs. Such refs
8 matches
Mail list logo