pinion on warning about '.git', as well? It probably
> > would make more sense as a patch on top, but I thought I'd ask before
> > this got merged to next.
>
> Yeah, it would make sense to reject what we would not record
> ourselves when the tools are used in
Having a ".git" entry inside a tree can cause confusing
results on checkout. At the top-level, you could not
checkout such a tree, as it would complain about overwriting
the real ".git" directory. In a subdirectory, you might
check it out, but performing operations in the subdirectory
would confus
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 08:50:41PM +0100, Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
> >Having a ".git" entry inside a tree can cause confusing
> >results on checkout. At the top-level, you could not
> >checkout such a tree, as it would complain about overwriting
> >the real ".git" directory. In a subdirectory,
On 11/30/2012 08:50 PM, Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
>> Having a ".git" entry inside a tree can cause confusing
>> results on checkout. At the top-level, you could not
>> checkout such a tree, as it would complain about overwriting
>> the real ".git" directory. In a subdirectory, you might
>> check
4 matches
Mail list logo
