[PATCH] git-fast-import(1): reorganise options

2013-01-06 Thread John Keeping
On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 11:12:25PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com writes: But in fact the current options list doesn't seem to be well organized at all. What do you think would be a logical way to group these? Features of input syntax --date-format

Re: [PATCH] git-fast-import(1): reorganise options

2013-01-06 Thread Jonathan Nieder
John Keeping wrote: How about this? Ah, our patches crossed. I left the Semantics of execution options with the general options since I couldn't think of a sensible heading Neat trick. :) [...] -- 8 -- The options in git-fast-import(1) are not currently arranged in a logical order,

Re: [PATCH] git-fast-import(1): reorganise options

2013-01-06 Thread John Keeping
On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 05:51:09AM -0800, Jonathan Nieder wrote: John Keeping wrote: I left the Semantics of execution options with the general options since I couldn't think of a sensible heading Neat trick. :) I took inspiration from git-pull(1), which has a few general options followed

Re: [PATCH] git-fast-import(1): reorganise options

2013-01-06 Thread Junio C Hamano
John Keeping j...@keeping.me.uk writes: On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 05:51:09AM -0800, Jonathan Nieder wrote: ... Nice description. While doing this, fix the duplicate '--done' documentation by taking the best bits of each. Also combine the descriptions of '--relative-marks' and