Hi Lars/Luke,
I tried a first test extending t9807-git-p4-submit.sh. I set this p4
trigger: 'p4test command pre-user-change "echo verbose trigger" '. I'm
able to reproduce the issue I wanted to fix. However I found yet
another issue, in this case when reading the result from
p4_read_pipe_lines (in
> On 24 Jun 2017, at 13:49, Luke Diamand wrote:
>
> On 22 June 2017 at 18:32, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Miguel Torroja writes:
>>
>>> The option -G of p4 (python marshal output) gives more context about the
>>> data being output. That's useful when using the command "change -o" as
>>> we can d
You are right about the "# add"comment. I couldn't find any extra info
in the marshaled output that I can use to add the change action
comment after the path. That's one downside of that change.
On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 1:49 PM, Luke Diamand wrote:
> On 22 June 2017 at 18:32, Junio C Hamano wrote
On 22 June 2017 at 18:32, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Miguel Torroja writes:
>
>> The option -G of p4 (python marshal output) gives more context about the
>> data being output. That's useful when using the command "change -o" as
>> we can distinguish between warning/error line and real change descrip
Miguel Torroja writes:
> The option -G of p4 (python marshal output) gives more context about the
> data being output. That's useful when using the command "change -o" as
> we can distinguish between warning/error line and real change description.
>
> Some p4 plugin/hooks in the server side gener
The option -G of p4 (python marshal output) gives more context about the
data being output. That's useful when using the command "change -o" as
we can distinguish between warning/error line and real change description.
Some p4 plugin/hooks in the server side generates some warnings when
executed.
6 matches
Mail list logo
