On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Eric Sunshine sunsh...@sunshineco.com writes:
+ This option is equivalent to the repository argument; the latter
+ wins if both are specified.
To what does latter refer in this case? (I presume it means the
Hello Junio, Michael -- thanks much for clearing this up for me.
Appreciate your time.
If the --repo option works just like the repository argument to git
push, then I would suggest -- just as Junio has done -- that you
deprecate this option. Otherwise, it would confuse users.
There is also a
Eric Sunshine sunsh...@sunshineco.com writes:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Eric Sunshine sunsh...@sunshineco.com writes:
+ This option is equivalent to the repository argument; the latter
+ wins if both are specified.
To what does
Eric Sunshine sunsh...@sunshineco.com writes:
+ This option is equivalent to the repository argument; the latter
+ wins if both are specified.
To what does latter refer in this case? (I presume it means the
standalone repository argument, though the text feels ambiguous.)
Also,
Michael J Gruber g...@drmicha.warpmail.net writes:
As per the code, the --repo repo option is equivalent to the repo
argument to 'git push'. [It exists for historical reasons, back from the time
when options had to come before arguments.]
Say so. [But not that.]
Signed-off-by: Michael J
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 7:35 AM, Michael J Gruber
g...@drmicha.warpmail.net wrote:
As per the code, the --repo repo option is equivalent to the repo
argument to 'git push'. [It exists for historical reasons, back from the time
when options had to come before arguments.]
Say so. [But not
As per the code, the --repo repo option is equivalent to the repo
argument to 'git push'. [It exists for historical reasons, back from the time
when options had to come before arguments.]
Say so. [But not that.]
Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber g...@drmicha.warpmail.net
---
Thanks for digging up
7 matches
Mail list logo
