Re: [PATCH] gpg-interface: check gpg signature for correct header

2016-06-14 Thread Michael J Gruber
Michael J Gruber venit, vidit, dixit 14.06.2016 13:34: > Jeff King venit, vidit, dixit 14.06.2016 13:20: >> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 01:11:19PM +0200, Michael J Gruber wrote: >> >>> When we create a signature, it may happen that gpg returns with >>> "success" but not with an actual detached

Re: [PATCH] gpg-interface: check gpg signature for correct header

2016-06-14 Thread Michael J Gruber
Jeff King venit, vidit, dixit 14.06.2016 13:20: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 01:11:19PM +0200, Michael J Gruber wrote: > >> When we create a signature, it may happen that gpg returns with >> "success" but not with an actual detached signature on stdout. >> >> Check for the correct header to catch

Re: [PATCH] gpg-interface: check gpg signature for correct header

2016-06-14 Thread Jeff King
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 01:11:19PM +0200, Michael J Gruber wrote: > When we create a signature, it may happen that gpg returns with > "success" but not with an actual detached signature on stdout. > > Check for the correct header to catch these cases better. Seems like a reasonable idea. I do

[PATCH] gpg-interface: check gpg signature for correct header

2016-06-14 Thread Michael J Gruber
When we create a signature, it may happen that gpg returns with "success" but not with an actual detached signature on stdout. Check for the correct header to catch these cases better. Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber --- This catches at least my echo example. We