On Wed, 2014-07-09 at 21:14 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Keller, Jacob E
jacob.e.kel...@intel.com wrote:
On Wed, 2014-07-09 at 15:59 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
What kind of things are missing, exactly? Perhaps that is something
you need to fix, instead
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 08:39:57PM +, Keller, Jacob E wrote:
Ok, I'll give it a shot. All I know for sure right now is running the
test directly passed and running from make test it failed.
When you say directly, I assume you mean cd t ./1234-xxx.sh.
You can also run a single-shot test
On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 04:14 +, Junio C Hamano wrote:
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Keller, Jacob E
jacob.e.kel...@intel.com wrote:
On Wed, 2014-07-09 at 15:59 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
What kind of things are missing, exactly? Perhaps that is something
you need to fix, instead
Running a specific test file manually does not obtain the exact
environment setup by the Makefile. Add ability to run any of the tests
in the t/ directory so that a user can more quickly debug a failing
test. Otherwise, the entire test suite needs to be run, which can take a
vary long time.
Jacob Keller jacob.e.kel...@intel.com writes:
Running a specific test file manually does not obtain the exact
environment setup by the Makefile.
What kind of things are missing, exactly? Perhaps that is something
you need to fix, instead of mucking with the top-level Makefile.
I recall last
On Wed, 2014-07-09 at 15:59 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Jacob Keller jacob.e.kel...@intel.com writes:
Running a specific test file manually does not obtain the exact
environment setup by the Makefile.
What kind of things are missing, exactly? Perhaps that is something
you need to fix,
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Keller, Jacob E
jacob.e.kel...@intel.com wrote:
On Wed, 2014-07-09 at 15:59 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
What kind of things are missing, exactly? Perhaps that is something
you need to fix, instead of mucking with the top-level Makefile.
It uses the git from
7 matches
Mail list logo
