in ab1a11be ("mingw_rmdir: set errno=ENOTEMPTY when appropriate"),
a check was added to prevent us from retrying to delete a directory
that is both in use and non-empty.
However, this logic was slightly flawed; since we didn't return
immediately, we end up falling out of the retry-loop, but right
Hi kusma,
On Tue, 4 Dec 2012, Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
> in ab1a11be ("mingw_rmdir: set errno=ENOTEMPTY when appropriate"),
> a check was added to prevent us from retrying to delete a directory
> that is both in use and non-empty.
>
> However, this logic was slightly flawed; since we didn't return
Sorry for a late reply.
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Johannes Schindelin
wrote:
> Hi kusma,
>
> On Tue, 4 Dec 2012, Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
>
>> in ab1a11be ("mingw_rmdir: set errno=ENOTEMPTY when appropriate"),
>> a check was added to prevent us from retrying to delete a directory
>> that is bo
Hi kusma,
On Wed, 5 Dec 2012, Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
> Sorry for a late reply.
Yeah, sorry, my replies tend to be delayed a lot. For the record: your
reply was not at all late.
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Johannes Schindelin
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 4 Dec 2012, Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
> >
>
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Johannes Schindelin
wrote:
> Hi kusma,
>
> On Wed, 5 Dec 2012, Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
>
>> Sorry for a late reply.
>
> Yeah, sorry, my replies tend to be delayed a lot. For the record: your
> reply was not at all late.
>
>> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Johannes Sc
Erik Faye-Lund writes:
> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Johannes Schindelin
> wrote:
> ...
> Since we're justifying the approaches, I'd like to explain why I
> preferred the return approach: it performs less tests. While this
> might sound like premature optimizations, performance is not why I
6 matches
Mail list logo
