Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
I think we can take your patch a step further, though, like:
-- 8 --
Subject: [PATCH] drop add_object_array_with_mode
...
Thanks. I think I picked up all incrementals in this thread, but
please holler if I missed anything.
--
To unsubscribe from this list:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 09:21:24AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
I think we can take your patch a step further, though, like:
-- 8 --
Subject: [PATCH] drop add_object_array_with_mode
...
Thanks. I think I picked up all incrementals in this thread,
On 19/10/14 03:03, Jeff King wrote:
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 12:19:07AM +0100, Ramsay Jones wrote:
[snip]
I actually wondered while writing this series whether anyone actually
_uses_ the mode in object_array (the new code I added sets it to the
appropriate value to be on the safe side, but
Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones ram...@ramsay1.demon.co.uk
---
Hi Jeff,
I noticed that your 'jk/prune-mtime' branch also removes the only
call to the add_object_array_with_mode() function outside of the
object.c file; specifically commit 75ac69fa (traverse_commit_list:
support pending blobs/trees
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 12:19:07AM +0100, Ramsay Jones wrote:
I noticed that your 'jk/prune-mtime' branch also removes the only
call to the add_object_array_with_mode() function outside of the
object.c file; specifically commit 75ac69fa (traverse_commit_list:
support pending blobs/trees with
5 matches
Mail list logo