The current protocol has the following problems that limit
us:
- It is not easy to make it resumable, because we
recompute every time. This is especially problematic for
the initial fetch aka clone as we will be talking about
a large transfer. Redirection to a bundle hosted on CDN
might
Martin Fick mf...@codeaurora.org writes:
The current protocol has the following problems that limit
us:
- It is not easy to make it resumable, because we
recompute every time. This is especially problematic for
the initial fetch aka clone as we will be talking about
a large transfer.
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Martin Fick mf...@codeaurora.org wrote:
The current protocol has the following problems that limit
us:
- It is not easy to make it resumable, because we
recompute every time. This is especially problematic for
the initial fetch aka clone as we will be
After looking at $gmane/264000 again, maybe the client should talk first
stating all the relevant information it wants to get, though I realize this
is not part of capabilities so maybe it could even before, such as:
Client: All I want to do is an ls-remote, so only Phase 2, no
transmission of
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 2:58 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
This is a follow-up on $gmane/264553, which is a continuation of
$gmane/264000, but instead of giving two required readings to
readers, I'll start with reproduction of the two, and add a few more
things the current
Duy Nguyen pclo...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 2:58 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
This is a follow-up on $gmane/264553, which is a continuation of
$gmane/264000, but instead of giving two required readings to
readers, I'll start with reproduction of the two, and add
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
I have a feeling that it is a bit too premature to specify the
details at such a low level as capaiblities are announced by
prefixing four-byte 'c', 'a', 'p', ':' in front and a multi-record
group has its element count at the beginning (or an end
On Mar 9, 2015, at 18:38, Duy Nguyen wrote:
A minor point on capability negotiation. I remember why I passed
capabilities via command line instead of this proposal. With this
proposal, daemon.c does not recognize i18n capability and cannot
switch to the correct language before it reports an
A minor point on capability negotiation. I remember why I passed
capabilities via command line instead of this proposal. With this
proposal, daemon.c does not recognize i18n capability and cannot
switch to the correct language before it reports an error.
But perhaps I approached it the wrong way.
Stefan Beller sbel...@google.com writes:
I do not see a good reason why we want I am sending N caps
upfront, instead of this, that, and here is the end of the group.
I thought about having an end marker, so something like
capabilities start
thin-pack
lang
ofs-delta
capabilities done
On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 6:38 AM, Stefan Beller sbel...@google.com wrote:
+Reference Discovery (v2)
+
+
+In version 2, reference discovery is initiated by the client with
+want-refs line. The client may skip reference discovery phase
+entirely by not sending want-refs
I'm still wondering if we should reserve more from the packet length.
We have used length for pkt-flush. Shawn pointed out that we
still have 0001, 0002 and 0003 but we may use some of them to avoid
abuse of pkt-flush in some cases. Perhaps we could limit packet length
to 0xfff0, so we have
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Stefan Beller sbel...@google.com wrote:
From: Duy Nguyen pclo...@gmail.com
Oops. I edited the proposal from Duy heavily(?), such that it is
different from what he proposed 4 days ago.
In my impression this is what most of the participants would agree on.
--
To
Stefan Beller sbel...@google.com writes:
@@ -67,7 +74,6 @@ gracefully with an error message.
error-line = PKT-LINE(ERR SP explanation-text)
-
SSH Transport
Noise?
@@ -124,9 +130,56 @@ has, the first can 'fetch' from the second. This
operation determines
what data
From: Duy Nguyen pclo...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller sbel...@google.com
---
Notes:
This is just aimed at untangling capabilities and refs
advertisement, no new features.
Hence this is missing the proposal from Duy to save one RTT.
I have the impression that most
On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Stefan Beller sbel...@google.com wrote:
+
+ advertised-refs = (no-refs / list-of-refs)
+ *shallow
+ flush-pkt
I am not sure if defining shallow as part of refs advertisement
is a good idea. The latter lives in the
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 4:28 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Stefan Beller sbel...@google.com writes:
@@ -67,7 +74,6 @@ gracefully with an error message.
error-line = PKT-LINE(ERR SP explanation-text)
-
SSH Transport
Noise?
@@ -124,9 +130,56 @@ has, the first
17 matches
Mail list logo
