On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 10:07:28AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jeff King writes:
>
> > This has a fairly straightforward conflict with the ref-transaction
> > stuff in pu. The "oldrefname" parameter to is_refname_available became a
> > list of items;
>
> Hmph, the trouble I had while reading
Jeff King writes:
> This has a fairly straightforward conflict with the ref-transaction
> stuff in pu. The "oldrefname" parameter to is_refname_available became a
> list of items;
Hmph, the trouble I had while reading the conflicts was about the
new "we skip these when repacking", not "oldrefnam
Our filesystem ref storage does not allow D/F conflicts; so
if "refs/heads/a/b" exists, we do not allow "refs/heads/a"
to exist (and vice versa). This falls out naturally for
loose refs, where the filesystem enforces the condition. But
for packed-refs, we have to make the check ourselves.
We do so
3 matches
Mail list logo
