On 08/14/2012 12:21 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
We said --date-order still does not violate the topology, but it
was still not clear enough.
Reword the description for both --date-order and --topo-order,
and add an illustration to it.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com
Thanks for
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
--topo-order::
-
- This option makes them appear in topological order (i.e.
- descendant commits are shown before their parents).
+ This option makes them appear in topological order. Even
+ without this option, descendant commits
Thomas Rast tr...@student.ethz.ch writes:
So the --topo-order switch *ensures* that we process commits in
topological order even in the face of skewed clocks.
Yes, I *think* that I attempted to show with the illustration.
I suspect that
+their parents, but this tries to avoid showing
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
Thomas Rast tr...@student.ethz.ch writes:
So the --topo-order switch *ensures* that we process commits in
topological order even in the face of skewed clocks.
Yes, I *think* that I attempted to show with the illustration.
But then the new
Martin von Zweigbergk martin.von.zweigbe...@gmail.com writes:
Still, the Even without this option strongly suggests to me that
what follows (descendant commits are shown before parents) applies
to the By default case. Would it be correct to say something like
By default, the commits are shown
Thomas Rast tr...@student.ethz.ch writes:
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
Thomas Rast tr...@student.ethz.ch writes:
So the --topo-order switch *ensures* that we process commits in
topological order even in the face of skewed clocks.
Yes, I *think* that I attempted to show with
We said --date-order still does not violate the topology, but it
was still not clear enough.
Reword the description for both --date-order and --topo-order,
and add an illustration to it.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com
---
* Let's do this before I forget...; came up in
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
* Let's do this before I forget...; came up in discussion $gmane/203370
Thanks! That definitely confused me (and I suppose I stupidly didn't
test with a proper range).
Documentation/rev-list-options.txt | 29
Martin von Zweigbergk martin.von.zweigbe...@gmail.com writes:
diff --git a/Documentation/rev-list-options.txt
b/Documentation/rev-list-options.txt
index 6a4b635..dc501ee 100644
--- a/Documentation/rev-list-options.txt
+++ b/Documentation/rev-list-options.txt
@@ -579,15 +579,32 @@ Commit
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Martin von Zweigbergk martin.von.zweigbe...@gmail.com writes:
diff --git a/Documentation/rev-list-options.txt
b/Documentation/rev-list-options.txt
index 6a4b635..dc501ee 100644
--- a/Documentation/rev-list-options.txt
10 matches
Mail list logo