Re: [PATCH] rev-parse --parseopt: allow [*=?!] in argument hints

2015-07-12 Thread Philip Oakley
From: Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2015 10:39 AM From: Ilya Bobyr It is not very likely that any of the "*=?!" Characters would be useful in the argument short or long names. On the other hand, there are already argument hints that contain the "=" sign. It used to be impossible to include any of

Re: [PATCH] rev-parse --parseopt: allow [*=?!] in argument hints

2015-07-12 Thread Junio C Hamano
ilya.bo...@gmail.com writes: > From: Ilya Bobyr > > It is not very likely that any of the "*=?!" Characters would be useful > in the argument short or long names. On the other hand, there are > already argument hints that contain the "=" sign. It used to be > impossible to include any of the "*

[PATCH] rev-parse --parseopt: allow [*=?!] in argument hints

2015-07-12 Thread ilya . bobyr
From: Ilya Bobyr It is not very likely that any of the "*=?!" Characters would be useful in the argument short or long names. On the other hand, there are already argument hints that contain the "=" sign. It used to be impossible to include any of the "*=?!" signs in the arguments hints before.