On Tue, 2013-10-08 at 15:22 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Duy Nguyen wrote:
>
> > Or maybe it's not that late. How about you go with your patch and add
> > thin-pack capability to receive-pack too?
> >
> > When new "git push" is used against old server, thin pack is disabled.
> > But that's not
Duy Nguyen wrote:
> Or maybe it's not that late. How about you go with your patch and add
> thin-pack capability to receive-pack too?
>
> When new "git push" is used against old server, thin pack is disabled.
> But that's not a big deal (I hope).
Could we have separate patches to introduce the se
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Carlos Martín Nieto wrote:
>> diff --git a/send-pack.c b/send-pack.c
>> index 7d172ef..7b88ac8 100644
>> --- a/send-pack.c
>> +++ b/send-pack.c
>> @@ -205,6 +205,8 @@ int send_pack(struct send_pack_args *args,
>>
Duy Nguyen writes:
On Tue, 2013-10-08 at 16:44 +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:
>On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Carlos Martín Nieto wrote:
> > diff --git a/send-pack.c b/send-pack.c
> > index 7d172ef..7b88ac8 100644
> > --- a/send-pack.c
> > +++ b/send-pack.c
> > @@ -205,6 +205,8 @@ int send_pack(struc
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Carlos Martín Nieto wrote:
> diff --git a/send-pack.c b/send-pack.c
> index 7d172ef..7b88ac8 100644
> --- a/send-pack.c
> +++ b/send-pack.c
> @@ -205,6 +205,8 @@ int send_pack(struct send_pack_args *args,
> quiet_supported = 1;
> if (server_s
Not every server out there supports fixing thin packs, so let's send
them a full pack.
Signed-off-by: Carlos Martín Nieto
---
It's not always possible to support thin packs (sometimes there isn't
even an object database to grab bases out of). And in any case git
shouldn't create thin packs if th
6 matches
Mail list logo
