Change the code for deciding what's to be done about %Z to stop
passing always either a NULL or "" char * to
strbuf_addftime(). Instead pass a boolean int to indicate whether the
strftime() %Z format should be omitted, which is what this code is
actually doing.
This code grew organically between t
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 02:46:03PM +, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> Change the code for deciding what's to be done about %Z to stop
> passing always either a NULL or "" char * to
> strbuf_addftime(). Instead pass a boolean int to indicate whether the
> strftime() %Z format should be omitted
On Fri, Jun 23 2017, Jeff King jotted:
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 02:46:03PM +, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>
>> Change the code for deciding what's to be done about %Z to stop
>> passing always either a NULL or "" char * to
>> strbuf_addftime(). Instead pass a boolean int to indicate wheth
Am 23.06.2017 um 16:46 schrieb Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason:
Change the code for deciding what's to be done about %Z to stop
passing always either a NULL or "" char * to
strbuf_addftime(). Instead pass a boolean int to indicate whether the
strftime() %Z format should be omitted, which is what this cod
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 05:13:38PM +0200, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> > The idea was that eventually the caller might be able to come up with a
> > TZ that is not blank, but is also not what strftime("%Z") would produce.
> > Conceivably that could be done if Git commits carried the "%Z"
> > i
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 05:20:19PM +0200, René Scharfe wrote:
> > diff --git a/strbuf.c b/strbuf.c
> > index be3b9e37b1..81ff3570e2 100644
> > --- a/strbuf.c
> > +++ b/strbuf.c
> > @@ -786,7 +786,7 @@ char *xstrfmt(const char *fmt, ...)
> > }
> > void strbuf_addftime(struct strbuf *sb, const c
Am 23.06.2017 um 17:25 schrieb Jeff King:
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 05:20:19PM +0200, René Scharfe wrote:
diff --git a/strbuf.c b/strbuf.c
index be3b9e37b1..81ff3570e2 100644
--- a/strbuf.c
+++ b/strbuf.c
@@ -786,7 +786,7 @@ char *xstrfmt(const char *fmt, ...)
}
void strbuf_addftime(struct
Am 23.06.2017 um 17:23 schrieb Jeff King:
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 05:13:38PM +0200, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
The idea was that eventually the caller might be able to come up with a
TZ that is not blank, but is also not what strftime("%Z") would produce.
Conceivably that could be done if G
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 06:23:10PM +0200, René Scharfe wrote:
> > > I have a WIP patch (which may not make it on-list, depending) playing
> > > with the idea I proposed in
> > > CACBZZX5OQc45fUyDVayE89rkT=+8m5s4efsxcabcy7upme5...@mail.gmail.com which
> > > just inserts the custom TZ name based on
Jeff King writes:
> The idea was that eventually the caller might be able to come up with a
> TZ that is not blank, but is also not what strftime("%Z") would produce.
> Conceivably that could be done if Git commits carried the "%Z"
> information (not likely), or if we used a reverse-lookup table
On Fri, Jun 23 2017, René Scharfe jotted:
> Am 23.06.2017 um 17:23 schrieb Jeff King:
>> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 05:13:38PM +0200, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>>
The idea was that eventually the caller might be able to come up with a
TZ that is not blank, but is also not what strftim
11 matches
Mail list logo
