Jens Lehmann wrote:
I suspect you got the idea for this patch from Marc's recent comment:
[...]
Yes, I did.
That is just a single user so far indicating your patch /could/ be an
improvement. I think we need quite some more votes on that before we
should do a change like this.
I thought
Am 01.10.2012 08:42, schrieb Ramkumar Ramachandra:
Jens Lehmann wrote:
That is just a single user so far indicating your patch /could/ be an
improvement. I think we need quite some more votes on that before we
should do a change like this.
I thought it's a porcelain command like 'git
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra artag...@gmail.com
---
git-submodule.sh | 15 ---
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/git-submodule.sh b/git-submodule.sh
index 1d61ebd..f8efc52 100755
--- a/git-submodule.sh
+++ b/git-submodule.sh
@@ -942,27 +942,28 @@
I'm not against the change per se, but do we really want to risk breaking
scripts which parse the output of git submodule status without even
providing a commit message explaining why we did that?
Am 29.09.2012 15:43, schrieb Ramkumar Ramachandra:
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra
Am 29.09.2012 16:45, schrieb Ramkumar Ramachandra:
Jens Lehmann wrote:
I'm not against the change per se, but do we really want to risk breaking
scripts which parse the output of git submodule status without even
providing a commit message explaining why we did that?
Oh, I didn't realize
5 matches
Mail list logo