On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 03:49:36PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
I'll queue this as-is, but it makes me wonder if we want to do this
without if/then/fi, e.g.
: ${LOGNAME:=${USER:-$(id -u -n)}
I'm fine with that too.
Spelling everything out with if/then/fi is obviously at the other
W. Trevor King wk...@tremily.us writes:
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 03:49:36PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
I'll queue this as-is, but it makes me wonder if we want to do this
without if/then/fi, e.g.
: ${LOGNAME:=${USER:-$(id -u -n)}
I'm fine with that too.
Spelling everything out
W. Trevor King wk...@tremily.us writes:
Previous LOGNAME discussion:
* Michael Gruber on 2011-05-06 suggesting a discussing a whoami
fallback [1] (but whoami isn't POSIX).
* René Scharfe on 2011-10-14 suggesting USER as a fallback for
LOGNAME [2].
* Matthieu Moy on 2012-09-17
Avoid:
# ./t1304-default-acl.sh
ok 1 - checking for a working acl setup
ok 2 - Setup test repo
not ok 3 - Objects creation does not break ACLs with restrictive umask
#
# # SHA1 for empty blob
# check_perms_and_acl
4 matches
Mail list logo