Am 15.09.2016 um 23:39 schrieb Junio C Hamano:
> René Scharfe writes:
>
>> Am 15.09.2016 um 22:01 schrieb Junio C Hamano:
>>> René Scharfe writes:
>>>
Take this for example:
- strbuf_addf(>obuf, _("(bad commit)\n"));
+
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 08:31:00PM +0200, René Scharfe wrote:
> Replace uses of strbuf_addf() for adding strings with more lightweight
> strbuf_addstr() calls. This makes the intent clearer and avoids
> potential issues with printf format specifiers.
>
> 02962d36845b89145cd69f8bc65e015d78ae3434
René Scharfe writes:
> Am 15.09.2016 um 22:01 schrieb Junio C Hamano:
>> René Scharfe writes:
>>
>>> Take this for example:
>>>
>>> - strbuf_addf(>obuf, _("(bad commit)\n"));
>>> + strbuf_addstr(>obuf, _("(bad commit)\n"));
>>>
Am 15.09.2016 um 22:01 schrieb Junio C Hamano:
> René Scharfe writes:
>
>> Take this for example:
>>
>> -strbuf_addf(>obuf, _("(bad commit)\n"));
>> +strbuf_addstr(>obuf, _("(bad commit)\n"));
>>
>> If there's a language that uses percent
René Scharfe writes:
> Take this for example:
>
> - strbuf_addf(>obuf, _("(bad commit)\n"));
> + strbuf_addstr(>obuf, _("(bad commit)\n"));
>
> If there's a language that uses percent signs instead of parens or as
> regular letters, then they
Am 15.09.2016 um 21:38 schrieb Jeff King:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:25:43PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Silly question: Is there a natural language that uses percent signs
as letters or e.g. instead of commas? :)
I don't know, but if they do, they'd better get used to escaping them.
:)
I
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:25:43PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >> Silly question: Is there a natural language that uses percent signs
> >> as letters or e.g. instead of commas? :)
> >
> > I don't know, but if they do, they'd better get used to escaping them.
> > :)
>
> I do not know either,
Jeff King writes:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 08:31:00PM +0200, René Scharfe wrote:
>
>> Replace uses of strbuf_addf() for adding strings with more lightweight
>> strbuf_addstr() calls. This makes the intent clearer and avoids
>> potential issues with printf format specifiers.
>>
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 08:31:00PM +0200, René Scharfe wrote:
> Replace uses of strbuf_addf() for adding strings with more lightweight
> strbuf_addstr() calls. This makes the intent clearer and avoids
> potential issues with printf format specifiers.
>
> 02962d36845b89145cd69f8bc65e015d78ae3434
Replace uses of strbuf_addf() for adding strings with more lightweight
strbuf_addstr() calls. This makes the intent clearer and avoids
potential issues with printf format specifiers.
02962d36845b89145cd69f8bc65e015d78ae3434 already converted six cases,
this patch covers eleven more.
A semantic
10 matches
Mail list logo