On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 09:41:25AM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 7:44 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > Stefan Beller writes:
> >
> >> (I note this as you regard your patches as a lunch time hack
> >> in the cooking email; I am serious
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 7:44 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Stefan Beller writes:
>
>> (I note this as you regard your patches as a lunch time hack
>> in the cooking email; I am serious about these patches though.)
>
> We do not want to touch borrowed code
Stefan Beller writes:
> (I note this as you regard your patches as a lunch time hack
> in the cooking email; I am serious about these patches though.)
We do not want to touch borrowed code unnecessarily. Are these
lines and bits hampering further progress we are actively
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Stefan Beller wrote:
>> Let's do this bit-shuffling as a preliminary clean-up.
>
> These 2 patches can go on top of that as well.
Actually these textually do not conflict with your patch,
and they can be picked independently, e.g. they could
> Let's do this bit-shuffling as a preliminary clean-up.
These 2 patches can go on top of that as well.
Thanks,
Stefan
Stefan Beller (2):
xdiff/xdiff.h: remove unused flags
xdiff/xdiffi.c: remove unneeded function declarations
xdiff/xdiff.h | 8
xdiff/xdiffi.c | 17
5 matches
Mail list logo