Re: [PATCH 0/2] avoid unsigned long for timestamps

2018-11-12 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi Carlo, On Mon, 12 Nov 2018, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón wrote: > specially problematic in Windows where unsigned long is only 32bit wide > and therefore the assumption that a time_t would fit will lead to loss > of precision in a 64bit OS. Both patches look correct to me. Thanks! Dscho > >

[PATCH 0/2] avoid unsigned long for timestamps

2018-11-12 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón
specially problematic in Windows where unsigned long is only 32bit wide and therefore the assumption that a time_t would fit will lead to loss of precision in a 64bit OS. builtin/commit.c | 4 ++-- read-cache.c | 6 +++--- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)