On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 09:28:20AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > Yes, I agree that these are an improvement regardless. If we follow
> > through on the cut-off to 7.19.4, then the CURLPROTO ones all go away.
> > But I don't mind rebasing any cut-off proposal on top of this work.
>
> Yeah I cam
Jeff King writes:
> On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 03:15:06PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> "Tom G. Christensen" writes:
>>
>> > The curl packages provided by Red Hat for RHEL contain several
>> > backports of features from later curl releases.
>> > This causes problems with current version based
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 03:15:06PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> "Tom G. Christensen" writes:
>
> > The curl packages provided by Red Hat for RHEL contain several
> > backports of features from later curl releases.
> > This causes problems with current version based checks in http.c.
> >
> > He
On 12/08/17 00:15, Junio C Hamano wrote:
"Tom G. Christensen" writes:
I have build tested these changes against upstream curl 7.12.0 (fails),
7.12.1 and 7.15.5. I have also built and run the testsuite against the
Red Hat provided curl versions listed above.
Hmph, what does "(fails)" mean he
"Tom G. Christensen" writes:
> The curl packages provided by Red Hat for RHEL contain several
> backports of features from later curl releases.
> This causes problems with current version based checks in http.c.
>
> Here is an overview of the features that have been backported:
> 7.10.6 (el3) Bac
The curl packages provided by Red Hat for RHEL contain several
backports of features from later curl releases.
This causes problems with current version based checks in http.c.
Here is an overview of the features that have been backported:
7.10.6 (el3) Backports CURLPROTO_*
7.12.1 (el4) Backports
6 matches
Mail list logo
