Re: [PATCH 0/2] test results for v1.7.12-rc0 on cygwin

2012-07-31 Thread Ramsay Jones
René Scharfe wrote: Am 28.07.2012 20:46, schrieb Ramsay Jones: Unfortunately, I was unable to reproduce the final failure in t7810-grep.sh. I tried, among other things, to provoke a failure thus: $ for i in $(seq 100); do if ! ./t7810-grep.sh -i -v; then break;

Re: [PATCH 0/2] test results for v1.7.12-rc0 on cygwin

2012-07-29 Thread René Scharfe
Am 28.07.2012 20:46, schrieb Ramsay Jones: Unfortunately, I was unable to reproduce the final failure in t7810-grep.sh. I tried, among other things, to provoke a failure thus: $ for i in $(seq 100); do if ! ./t7810-grep.sh -i -v; then break; fi done $ but,

Re: [PATCH 0/2] test results for v1.7.12-rc0 on cygwin

2012-07-29 Thread Junio C Hamano
René Scharfe rene.scha...@lsrfire.ath.cx writes: Am 28.07.2012 20:46, schrieb Ramsay Jones: Unfortunately, I was unable to reproduce the final failure in t7810-grep.sh. I tried, among other things, to provoke a failure thus: $ for i in $(seq 100); do if ! ./t7810-grep.sh -i -v;

[PATCH 0/2] test results for v1.7.12-rc0 on cygwin

2012-07-28 Thread Ramsay Jones
Hi Junio, I actually tested v1.7.12-rc0-22-gcdd159b, thus: $ time $(GIT_SKIP_TESTS='t0061.3 t0070.3 t9010 t9300' make test test-outp1 21) real137m11.901s user118m55.071s sys 59m50.695s $ the result, ignoring the explicity skipped tests (nothing new there),