Johannes Schindelin writes:
> Hi Olga,
>
> On Fri, 13 Jul 2018, Оля Тележная wrote:
>
>> 2018-07-09 11:27 GMT+03:00 Оля Тележная :
>> > Hello everyone,
>> > This is my new attempt to start using oid_object_info_extended() in
>> > ref-filter. You could look at previous one [1] [2] but it is not
Hi Olga,
On Fri, 13 Jul 2018, Оля Тележная wrote:
> 2018-07-09 11:27 GMT+03:00 Оля Тележная :
> > Hello everyone,
> > This is my new attempt to start using oid_object_info_extended() in
> > ref-filter. You could look at previous one [1] [2] but it is not
> > necessary.
> >
> > The goal (still)
2018-07-09 11:27 GMT+03:00 Оля Тележная :
> Hello everyone,
> This is my new attempt to start using oid_object_info_extended() in
> ref-filter. You could look at previous one [1] [2] but it is not
> necessary.
>
> The goal (still) is to improve performance by avoiding calling expensive
> functions
Hi Olga,
On Mon, 9 Jul 2018, Оля Тележная wrote:
> [2]
> https://public-inbox.org/git/010201637254c969-a346030e-0b75-41ad-8ef3-2ac7e04ba4fb-000...@eu-west-1.amazonses.com/
This type of Message-Id makes me think that you used SubmitGit to send
this patch series.
The main problem I see here is
Оля Тележная writes:
> Hello everyone,
> This is my new attempt to start using oid_object_info_extended() in
> ref-filter. You could look at previous one [1] [2] but it is not
> necessary.
Yup, it sounds like a sensible thing to do to try asking object-info
helper instead of reading the whole
Hello everyone,
This is my new attempt to start using oid_object_info_extended() in
ref-filter. You could look at previous one [1] [2] but it is not
necessary.
The goal (still) is to improve performance by avoiding calling expensive
functions when we don't need the information they provide
or
6 matches
Mail list logo