On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 9:04 PM, Stefan Beller wrote:
>>
>>> I don't know why submodules were originally designed to be in a
>>> detached HEAD state but I much prefer working on branches (as I'm sure
>>> many other developers do) so the prospect of this becoming the norm is
>>>
On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 6:35 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Brandon Williams writes:
>
>> I don't know why submodules were originally designed to be in a
>> detached HEAD state but I much prefer working on branches (as I'm sure
>> many other developers do) so
Brandon Williams writes:
> I don't know why submodules were originally designed to be in a
> detached HEAD state but I much prefer working on branches (as I'm sure
> many other developers do) so the prospect of this becoming the norm is
> exciting! :D
The reason is because
On 05/01, Stefan Beller wrote:
> The first three patches fix bugs in existing submodule code,
> sort of independent from the last 2 patches, which are RFCs.
>
>
>
> In submodules as of today you always end up with a detached HEAD,
> which may be scary to people used to working on branches. (I
The first three patches fix bugs in existing submodule code,
sort of independent from the last 2 patches, which are RFCs.
In submodules as of today you always end up with a detached HEAD,
which may be scary to people used to working on branches. (I myself
enjoy working with a detached HEAD).
5 matches
Mail list logo