On 1/24/2019 6:39 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> "Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget" writes:
>
>> This series is based on ab/commit-graph-write-progress and bc/sha-256.
>
> Thanks.
>
> It seems that the base (i.e. merge between these two topics) you
> used may have used a version of either topic (mo
"Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget" writes:
> This series is based on ab/commit-graph-write-progress and bc/sha-256.
Thanks.
It seems that the base (i.e. merge between these two topics) you
used may have used a version of either topic (most likely the
latter) slightly older than what I have, as p
"Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget" writes:
> The commit-graph file format has some shortcomings that were discussed
> on-list:
> ...
> This series adds a new version (2) to the commit-graph file.
Sigh. It is unfortunate that we have to bump the format version
this early before we can say "it is
The commit-graph file format has some shortcomings that were discussed
on-list:
1. It doesn't use the 4-byte format ID from the_hash_algo.
2. There is no way to change the reachability index from generation numbers
to corrected commit date [1].
3. The unused byte in the
4 matches
Mail list logo