Hi Peff,
On Fri, 21 Jun 2019, Jeff King wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 03:16:52PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>
> > > I think your warning in the manpage that this is for debugging is fine,
> > > as it does not put us on the hook for maintaining the feature nor its
> > > format forever. W
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 4:32 PM Johannes Schindelin
wrote:
>
> Hi Duy,
>
> On Fri, 21 Jun 2019, Duy Nguyen wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 8:16 PM Johannes Schindelin
> > wrote:
> >
> > > > I think your warning in the manpage that this is for debugging is fine,
> > > > as it does not put us
Hi Peff & Junio,
On Fri, 21 Jun 2019, Jeff King wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 08:10:58AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> > Duy Nguyen writes:
> >
> > > Considering the amount of code to output these, supporting multiple
> > > formats would be a nightmare. I may be ok with versioning the outp
Hi Duy,
On Fri, 21 Jun 2019, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 8:16 PM Johannes Schindelin
> wrote:
>
> > > I think your warning in the manpage that this is for debugging is fine,
> > > as it does not put us on the hook for maintaining the feature nor its
> > > format forever. We might
On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 6:31 AM brian m. carlson
wrote:
>
> On 2019-06-19 at 09:58:50, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
> > This is probably just my itch. Every time I have to do something with
> > the index, I need to add a little bit code here, a little bit there to
> > get a better "view" of the ind
On 2019-06-19 at 09:58:50, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
> This is probably just my itch. Every time I have to do something with
> the index, I need to add a little bit code here, a little bit there to
> get a better "view" of the index.
>
> This solves it for me. It allows me to see pretty much eve
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 08:10:58AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Duy Nguyen writes:
>
> > Considering the amount of code to output these, supporting multiple
> > formats would be a nightmare. I may be ok with versioning the output
> > so the tool know what format they need to deal with, but I'd
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 03:16:52PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > I think your warning in the manpage that this is for debugging is fine,
> > as it does not put us on the hook for maintaining the feature nor its
> > format forever. We might want to call it "--debug=json" or something,
> > t
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 03:37:45PM +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 2:17 AM Jeff King wrote:
> > I think your warning in the manpage that this is for debugging is fine,
> > as it does not put us on the hook for maintaining the feature nor its
> > format forever. We might want to
Duy Nguyen writes:
> Considering the amount of code to output these, supporting multiple
> formats would be a nightmare. I may be ok with versioning the output
> so the tool know what format they need to deal with, but I'd rather
> support just one version. For third parties wanting to dig deep,
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 8:16 PM Johannes Schindelin
wrote:
> > I think your warning in the manpage that this is for debugging is fine,
> > as it does not put us on the hook for maintaining the feature nor its
> > format forever. We might want to call it "--debug=json" or something,
> > though, in
Hi Peff,
On Wed, 19 Jun 2019, Jeff King wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 04:58:50PM +0700, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
>
> > This is probably just my itch. Every time I have to do something with
> > the index, I need to add a little bit code here, a little bit there to
> > get a better "view" of
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 2:17 AM Jeff King wrote:
> I think your warning in the manpage that this is for debugging is fine,
> as it does not put us on the hook for maintaining the feature nor its
> format forever. We might want to call it "--debug=json" or something,
Hmm.. does it mean we make --d
On 6/19/2019 5:58 AM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
This is probably just my itch. Every time I have to do something with
the index, I need to add a little bit code here, a little bit there to
get a better "view" of the index.
This solves it for me. It allows me to see pretty much everything in
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy writes:
> This is probably just my itch. Every time I have to do something with
> the index, I need to add a little bit code here, a little bit there to
> get a better "view" of the index.
;-)
JSON is not particularly my cup-of-tea but it is better than many
other things
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 04:58:50PM +0700, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
> This is probably just my itch. Every time I have to do something with
> the index, I need to add a little bit code here, a little bit there to
> get a better "view" of the index.
>
> This solves it for me. It allows me to see
On 6/19/2019 8:42 AM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 6:58 PM Derrick Stolee wrote:
>>
>> On 6/19/2019 5:58 AM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
>>> This is probably just my itch. Every time I have to do something with
>>> the index, I need to add a little bit code here, a little bit there
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 6:58 PM Derrick Stolee wrote:
>
> On 6/19/2019 5:58 AM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
> > This is probably just my itch. Every time I have to do something with
> > the index, I need to add a little bit code here, a little bit there to
> > get a better "view" of the index.
> >
On 6/19/2019 5:58 AM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
> This is probably just my itch. Every time I have to do something with
> the index, I need to add a little bit code here, a little bit there to
> get a better "view" of the index.
>
> This solves it for me. It allows me to see pretty much everythi
This is probably just my itch. Every time I have to do something with
the index, I need to add a little bit code here, a little bit there to
get a better "view" of the index.
This solves it for me. It allows me to see pretty much everything in the
index (except really low detail stuff like pathnam
20 matches
Mail list logo
