On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 12:54:51PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jeff King writes:
>
> > Not that you probably need more random cases of C code, but I happened
> > to be looking at a diff in git.git today, b333d0d6, which is another
> > regression for the compaction heuristic.
>
> Wow, that on
Jeff King writes:
> Not that you probably need more random cases of C code, but I happened
> to be looking at a diff in git.git today, b333d0d6, which is another
> regression for the compaction heuristic.
Wow, that one is _really_ bad. Does it have something to do with
the removal being at the
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 12:00:28AM +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> I've talked about this quite a bit on the list already. The idea is to
> improve ugly diffs like
>
> @@ -231,6 +231,9 @@ if (!defined $initial_reply_to && $prompting) {
> }
>
> if (!$smtp_server) {
> + $s
I've talked about this quite a bit on the list already. The idea is to
improve ugly diffs like
@@ -231,6 +231,9 @@ if (!defined $initial_reply_to && $prompting) {
}
if (!$smtp_server) {
+ $smtp_server = $repo->config('sendemail.smtpserver');
+}
+if (!$smtp_server)
On 08/04/2016 12:00 AM, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> I've talked about this quite a bit on the list already. The idea is to
> improve ugly diffs
I forgot to note that this patch series is also available from my GitHub
account [1] as branch "diff-indent-heuristics".
Also, I will be away from my compu
5 matches
Mail list logo
