On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 07:14:38PM +0200, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> Am 17.05.2017 um 14:05 schrieb Michael Haggerty:
> > This patch series is the next leg on a journey towards reading
> > `packed-refs` using `mmap()`, the most interesting aspect of which is
> > that we will often be able to avoid
Am 17.05.2017 um 14:05 schrieb Michael Haggerty:
This patch series is the next leg on a journey towards reading
`packed-refs` using `mmap()`, the most interesting aspect of which is
that we will often be able to avoid having to read the whole
`packed-refs` file if we only need a subset of
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 6:42 AM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 02:05:23PM +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote:
>
>> This patch series is the next leg on a journey towards reading
>> `packed-refs` using `mmap()`, the most interesting aspect of which is
>> that we will often
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 02:05:23PM +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> This patch series is the next leg on a journey towards reading
> `packed-refs` using `mmap()`, the most interesting aspect of which is
> that we will often be able to avoid having to read the whole
> `packed-refs` file if we only
This patch series is the next leg on a journey towards reading
`packed-refs` using `mmap()`, the most interesting aspect of which is
that we will often be able to avoid having to read the whole
`packed-refs` file if we only need a subset of references.
The first leg of the journey was separating
5 matches
Mail list logo