Re: [PATCH 00/23] Prepare to separate out a packed_ref_store

2017-05-18 Thread Jeff King
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 07:14:38PM +0200, Johannes Sixt wrote: > Am 17.05.2017 um 14:05 schrieb Michael Haggerty: > > This patch series is the next leg on a journey towards reading > > `packed-refs` using `mmap()`, the most interesting aspect of which is > > that we will often be able to avoid

Re: [PATCH 00/23] Prepare to separate out a packed_ref_store

2017-05-18 Thread Johannes Sixt
Am 17.05.2017 um 14:05 schrieb Michael Haggerty: This patch series is the next leg on a journey towards reading `packed-refs` using `mmap()`, the most interesting aspect of which is that we will often be able to avoid having to read the whole `packed-refs` file if we only need a subset of

Re: [PATCH 00/23] Prepare to separate out a packed_ref_store

2017-05-17 Thread Stefan Beller
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 6:42 AM, Jeff King wrote: > On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 02:05:23PM +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote: > >> This patch series is the next leg on a journey towards reading >> `packed-refs` using `mmap()`, the most interesting aspect of which is >> that we will often

Re: [PATCH 00/23] Prepare to separate out a packed_ref_store

2017-05-17 Thread Jeff King
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 02:05:23PM +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote: > This patch series is the next leg on a journey towards reading > `packed-refs` using `mmap()`, the most interesting aspect of which is > that we will often be able to avoid having to read the whole > `packed-refs` file if we only

[PATCH 00/23] Prepare to separate out a packed_ref_store

2017-05-17 Thread Michael Haggerty
This patch series is the next leg on a journey towards reading `packed-refs` using `mmap()`, the most interesting aspect of which is that we will often be able to avoid having to read the whole `packed-refs` file if we only need a subset of references. The first leg of the journey was separating