Re: [PATCH 00/24] object_id part 10

2017-10-02 Thread brian m. carlson
On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 04:34:44PM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote: > On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 3:08 PM, brian m. carlson > wrote: > > I apologize for the unintended bounced emails that occurred in late > > August; my mail server (previously hosted at home) got knocked

Re: [PATCH 00/24] object_id part 10

2017-10-02 Thread Stefan Beller
On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 3:08 PM, brian m. carlson wrote: > This is the tenth in a series of patches to convert from unsigned char > [20] to struct object_id. This series mostly involves changes to the > refs code. After these changes, there are almost no references

Re: [PATCH 00/24] object_id part 10

2017-10-02 Thread Brandon Williams
On 10/01, brian m. carlson wrote: > This is the tenth in a series of patches to convert from unsigned char > [20] to struct object_id. This series mostly involves changes to the > refs code. After these changes, there are almost no references to > unsigned char in the main refs code. > > I've

[PATCH 00/24] object_id part 10

2017-10-01 Thread brian m. carlson
This is the tenth in a series of patches to convert from unsigned char [20] to struct object_id. This series mostly involves changes to the refs code. After these changes, there are almost no references to unsigned char in the main refs code. I've tried to update the code comments as I've