On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 03:53:52AM +0100, SZEDER Gábor wrote:
cmd1
for i in a b c; do
cmd2 $i
done
cmd3
which will not notice failures of cmd2 a or cmd b
s/cmd b/cmd2 b/ ?
Yes, but the patches are already in next, so it is sadly too late for
commit
Quoting Jeff King p...@peff.net:
However, there are a number of places it cannot reach:
- it cannot find a failure to break out of loops on error,
like:
cmd1
for i in a b c; do
cmd2 $i
done
cmd3
which will not notice failures of cmd2 a or cmd b
It's easy to miss an -chain in a test script, like:
test_expect_success 'check something important' '
cmd1
cmd2
cmd3
'
The test harness will notice if cmd3 fails, but a failure of
cmd1 or cmd2 will go unnoticed, as their exit status is lost
after cmd3 runs.
The toy
3 matches
Mail list logo
