On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 9:27 PM, Stefan Beller wrote:
> Hi Brandon,
>
>>> One of the reviewers of the series questioned the overall goal of the
>>> series as we want to move away from _die() in top level code but this
>>> series moves more towards it.
>>
>> I've heard every
Hi Brandon,
>> One of the reviewers of the series questioned the overall goal of the
>> series as we want to move away from _die() in top level code but this
>> series moves more towards it.
>
> I've heard every once in a while that we want to move toward this but I
> don't believe there is an
On 05/21, Stefan Beller wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 11:37 PM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> > On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 03:21:09PM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote:
> >> A common pattern with the repo_read_index function is to die if the return
> >> of repo_read_index is negative. Move
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 11:37 PM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 03:21:09PM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote:
>> A common pattern with the repo_read_index function is to die if the return
>> of repo_read_index is negative. Move this pattern into a function.
>>
>> This
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 03:21:09PM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote:
> A common pattern with the repo_read_index function is to die if the return
> of repo_read_index is negative. Move this pattern into a function.
>
> This patch replaces the calls of repo_read_index with its _or_die version,
> if the
A common pattern with the repo_read_index function is to die if the return
of repo_read_index is negative. Move this pattern into a function.
This patch replaces the calls of repo_read_index with its _or_die version,
if the error message is exactly the same.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller
6 matches
Mail list logo