On 6/18/2018 3:55 PM, Stefan Beller wrote:
But as this is plumbing and users should not need to worry about it
this is optional, I would think.
The design document is also in 'Documentation/technical' instead of just
'Documentation/'. Do we have a pattern of linking to the technical
documents?
> > But as this is plumbing and users should not need to worry about it
> > this is optional, I would think.
>
> The design document is also in 'Documentation/technical' instead of just
> 'Documentation/'. Do we have a pattern of linking to the technical
> documents?
Apparently we do (and I was
On 6/11/2018 5:02 PM, Stefan Beller wrote:
Hi Derrick,
On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 7:03 AM Derrick Stolee wrote:
This new 'git midx' builtin will be the plumbing access for writing,
reading, and checking multi-pack-index (MIDX) files. The initial
implementation is a no-op.
Let's talk about the
On 6/7/2018 1:20 PM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 4:03 PM, Derrick Stolee wrote:
diff --git a/Documentation/git-midx.txt b/Documentation/git-midx.txt
new file mode 100644
index 00..2bd886f1a2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/git-midx.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+git-midx(1)
Hi Derrick,
On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 7:03 AM Derrick Stolee wrote:
>
> This new 'git midx' builtin will be the plumbing access for writing,
> reading, and checking multi-pack-index (MIDX) files. The initial
> implementation is a no-op.
Let's talk about the name for a second:
.idx files are
On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 4:03 PM, Derrick Stolee wrote:
> diff --git a/Documentation/git-midx.txt b/Documentation/git-midx.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 00..2bd886f1a2
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/git-midx.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
> +git-midx(1)
> +
> +
> +NAME
>
This new 'git midx' builtin will be the plumbing access for writing,
reading, and checking multi-pack-index (MIDX) files. The initial
implementation is a no-op.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee
---
.gitignore | 1 +
Documentation/git-midx.txt | 29 +
7 matches
Mail list logo
