On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 4:45 AM Jeff King wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 12:01:43AM -0800, Elijah Newren wrote:
>
> > > It does seem funny that the behavior for the earlier case (bounded
> > > commits) and this case (skipping some commits) are different. Would you
> > > ever want to keep
On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 12:01:43AM -0800, Elijah Newren wrote:
> > It does seem funny that the behavior for the earlier case (bounded
> > commits) and this case (skipping some commits) are different. Would you
> > ever want to keep walking backwards to find an ancestor in the earlier
> > case? Or
On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 10:53 PM Jeff King wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 10:23:08PM -0800, Elijah Newren wrote:
>
> > If file paths are specified to fast-export and multiple refs point to a
> > commit that does not touch any of the relevant file paths, then
> > fast-export can hit problems.
On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 10:23:08PM -0800, Elijah Newren wrote:
> If file paths are specified to fast-export and multiple refs point to a
> commit that does not touch any of the relevant file paths, then
> fast-export can hit problems. fast-export has a list of additional refs
> that it needs to
If file paths are specified to fast-export and multiple refs point to a
commit that does not touch any of the relevant file paths, then
fast-export can hit problems. fast-export has a list of additional refs
that it needs to explicitly set after exporting all blobs and commits,
and when it tries
5 matches
Mail list logo
