On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 9:49 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 04:10:48PM +0700, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
>
>> Instead of using 8 bytes (on 64 bit arch) to store a pointer to a
>> pack. Use an index isntead since the number of packs should be
>> relatively small.
>>
>> This limits t
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy writes:
> Instead of using 8 bytes (on 64 bit arch) to store a pointer to a
> pack. Use an index isntead since the number of packs should be
> relatively small.
>
> This limits the number of packs we can handle to 256 (still
> unreasonably high for a repo to work well). If y
On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 04:10:48PM +0700, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
> Instead of using 8 bytes (on 64 bit arch) to store a pointer to a
> pack. Use an index isntead since the number of packs should be
> relatively small.
>
> This limits the number of packs we can handle to 256 (still
> unreason
On Thu, Mar 01 2018, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy jotted:
> pack. Use an index isntead since the number of packs should be
s/isntead/instead/
> This limits the number of packs we can handle to 256 (still
> unreasonably high for a repo to work well). If you have more than 256
> packs, you'll need an old
Instead of using 8 bytes (on 64 bit arch) to store a pointer to a
pack. Use an index isntead since the number of packs should be
relatively small.
This limits the number of packs we can handle to 256 (still
unreasonably high for a repo to work well). If you have more than 256
packs, you'll need an
5 matches
Mail list logo