Re: [PATCH 07/16] t5304: use test_path_is_* instead of "test -f"

Jeff King writes: > This is slightly more robust (checking "! test -f" would not > notice a directory of the same name, though that is not > likely to happen here). It also makes debugging easier, as > the test script will output a message on failure. > > Signed-off-by: Jeff King > --- > This pa

[PATCH 07/16] t5304: use test_path_is_* instead of "test -f"

This is slightly more robust (checking "! test -f" would not notice a directory of the same name, though that is not likely to happen here). It also makes debugging easier, as the test script will output a message on failure. Signed-off-by: Jeff King --- This patch is totally optional. I did it w