[PATCH 08/20] tempfile: prefer is_tempfile_active to bare access

[Jeff King]

The tempfile code keeps an "active" flag, and we have a
number of assertions to make sure that the objects are being
used in the right order. Most of these directly check
"active" rather than using the is_tempfile_active()
accessor.

Let's prefer using the accessor, in preparation for it
growing more complicated logic (like checking for NULL).

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <p...@peff.net>
---
 tempfile.c | 16 ++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tempfile.c b/tempfile.c
index c6740e562c..964c66d504 100644
--- a/tempfile.c
+++ b/tempfile.c
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ static void prepare_tempfile_object(struct tempfile *tempfile)
                atexit(remove_tempfiles_on_exit);
        }
 
-       if (tempfile->active)
+       if (is_tempfile_active(tempfile))
                die("BUG: prepare_tempfile_object called for active object");
        if (!tempfile->on_list) {
                /* Initialize *tempfile and add it to tempfile_list: */
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ int xmks_tempfile_m(struct tempfile *tempfile, const char 
*template, int mode)
 
 FILE *fdopen_tempfile(struct tempfile *tempfile, const char *mode)
 {
-       if (!tempfile->active)
+       if (!is_tempfile_active(tempfile))
                die("BUG: fdopen_tempfile() called for inactive object");
        if (tempfile->fp)
                die("BUG: fdopen_tempfile() called for open object");
@@ -215,21 +215,21 @@ FILE *fdopen_tempfile(struct tempfile *tempfile, const 
char *mode)
 
 const char *get_tempfile_path(struct tempfile *tempfile)
 {
-       if (!tempfile->active)
+       if (!is_tempfile_active(tempfile))
                die("BUG: get_tempfile_path() called for inactive object");
        return tempfile->filename.buf;
 }
 
 int get_tempfile_fd(struct tempfile *tempfile)
 {
-       if (!tempfile->active)
+       if (!is_tempfile_active(tempfile))
                die("BUG: get_tempfile_fd() called for inactive object");
        return tempfile->fd;
 }
 
 FILE *get_tempfile_fp(struct tempfile *tempfile)
 {
-       if (!tempfile->active)
+       if (!is_tempfile_active(tempfile))
                die("BUG: get_tempfile_fp() called for inactive object");
        return tempfile->fp;
 }
@@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ int reopen_tempfile(struct tempfile *tempfile)
 {
        if (0 <= tempfile->fd)
                die("BUG: reopen_tempfile called for an open object");
-       if (!tempfile->active)
+       if (!is_tempfile_active(tempfile))
                die("BUG: reopen_tempfile called for an inactive object");
        tempfile->fd = open(tempfile->filename.buf, O_WRONLY);
        return tempfile->fd;
@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ int reopen_tempfile(struct tempfile *tempfile)
 
 int rename_tempfile(struct tempfile *tempfile, const char *path)
 {
-       if (!tempfile->active)
+       if (!is_tempfile_active(tempfile))
                die("BUG: rename_tempfile called for inactive object");
 
        if (close_tempfile_gently(tempfile)) {
@@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ int rename_tempfile(struct tempfile *tempfile, const char 
*path)
 
 void delete_tempfile(struct tempfile *tempfile)
 {
-       if (!tempfile->active)
+       if (!is_tempfile_active(tempfile))
                return;
 
        close_tempfile_gently(tempfile);
-- 
2.14.1.721.gc5bc1565f1