Duy Nguyen writes:
>> This shouldn't be needed either. My assumption was that if someone
>> explicitly asked for multiple threads we're better off failing than
>> silently ignoring their request. The default/automatic setting will
>> detect the number of cpus and behave correctly.
>
> No. I can
On 10/29/2018 1:21 PM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 6:05 PM Ben Peart wrote:
@@ -2756,8 +2745,11 @@ static int do_write_index(struct index_state *istate,
struct tempfile *tempfile,
if (ce_write(&c, newfd, &hdr, sizeof(hdr)) < 0)
return -1;
-#ifndef NO_PTH
On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 6:05 PM Ben Peart wrote:
> > @@ -2756,8 +2745,11 @@ static int do_write_index(struct index_state
> > *istate, struct tempfile *tempfile,
> > if (ce_write(&c, newfd, &hdr, sizeof(hdr)) < 0)
> > return -1;
> >
> > -#ifndef NO_PTHREADS
> > - nr_threads
On 10/27/2018 3:10 AM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
---
read-cache.c | 49 ++---
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/read-cache.c b/read-cache.c
index d57958233e..ba870bc3fd 100644
--
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
---
read-cache.c | 49 ++---
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/read-cache.c b/read-cache.c
index d57958233e..ba870bc3fd 100644
--- a/read-cache.c
+++ b/read-cache.c
@@ -1920,19 +1920,15 @
5 matches
Mail list logo