>> This was actually discussed in a separate thread [1] some time ago with
>> patches proposed by Thandesha and me.
>> I haven't yet got time to cook a final patch, which addresses both
>> Thandesha's and mine use-cases though,
>> so this wasn't submitted to Junio yet.
>> In the meantime, I
On 23 May 2018 at 17:41, Mazo, Andrey wrote:
>> The last one (i.e. "even if it is verbose, if fileSize is not
>> reported, do not write the verbose output") does not look like it is
>> limited to the unshelve feature, so it might, even though it is a
>> one-liner, deserve to
> The last one (i.e. "even if it is verbose, if fileSize is not
> reported, do not write the verbose output") does not look like it is
> limited to the unshelve feature, so it might, even though it is a
> one-liner, deserve to be a separate preparatory patch if you want.
> But I do not feel
Luke Diamand writes:
>> However, instead of a separate patch, wouldn't it be better to squash
>> it into the previous one? So 'make test' would succeed on every
>> commit even with a newer p4 version.
>
> Junio?
>
> I can squash together the original commit and the two fixes
On 22 May 2018 at 11:15, SZEDER Gábor wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 10:41 AM, Luke Diamand wrote:
>> SZEDER Gábor found that the unshelve tests fail with newer
>> versions of Perforce (2016 vs 2015).
>>
>> The problem arises because when a file is added
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 10:41 AM, Luke Diamand wrote:
> SZEDER Gábor found that the unshelve tests fail with newer
> versions of Perforce (2016 vs 2015).
>
> The problem arises because when a file is added in a P4
> shelved changelist, the depot revision is shown as "none"
> if
SZEDER Gábor found that the unshelve tests fail with newer
versions of Perforce (2016 vs 2015).
The problem arises because when a file is added in a P4
shelved changelist, the depot revision is shown as "none"
if using the older p4d (which makes sense - the file doesn't
yet exist, so can't have a
7 matches
Mail list logo